The exhibition was the idea of a Mr. Boake.
Seldom has a collection of greater interest to the trade been on view in London than the display of foreign and Colonial beers at the works of Messrs. A. Boake, Roberts, and Co., Stratford, between October the 20th and 24th. Great praise is due to Mr. Arthur Boake for having in his recent tour round the world conceived the idea-'of making arrangements with the various brewery companies he visited for the getting together of such an interesting collection; nor must we omit to mention the very excellent way in which this idea was carried into effect. The beers were most tastefully arranged, and every facility was given to those who were present at the exhibition to inspect and taste as many of the samples as they desired.
The Brewers' Journal vol. 38 1902, November 15th 1902, page 672.
In total, there were around 80 beers exhibited. Coming from Europe, Asia, America, Africa and Australia. Which is pretty impressive given that all would have been shipped by sea. Something which would have taken weeks or even months in 1902. Coordinating the deliveries from all the different parts of the globe must have been a nightmare. I assume that it was mostly arranged by telegram.
I found this an interesting remark on pasteurised beer:
The lager beers of France and Belgium were on the whole very creditable samples; we certainly preferred the non-Pasteurised to tne Pasteurised, as the latter had for the most part the peculiar flavour characteristic of some Pasteurised beers which obscured their original taste.
The Brewers' Journal vol. 38 1902, November 15th 1902, page 672.
I think I'm with the jury there on pasteurisation.
A good dark lager beer was the Trappist Monastery beer (Holland). Some of the Russian beers were excellent of their kind. A dark lager from the Brasserie Francois Lutoslawski Fils was a very full-drinking sample, resembling the Munich "Salvator Bier” in type, but decidedly sweeter. We determined the original gravity of a sample of this beer, and found it to be 1090. The Lezak beer of a Warsaw firm was a fine pale lager, but quite different from the German pale beers in character, being much fuller. Messrs. D. Carnegie and Co., Goteborg, Sweden, sent a very good sample of stout.
The Brewers' Journal vol. 38 1902, November 15th 1902, page 672.
Was the La Trappe beer really a Lager? Odd that it's the only Dutch beer represented, as it was pretty small. Also odd that they were exporting to Java.
That Lutoslawski must have been incredibly sweet if it was sweeter than Salvator. Interesting that they, correctly, call Carnegie Porter a Stout. Which, of corse, it was. That's one of the specific beers featured that I've drunk.
Interested in seeing a full list of the beers exhibited? I don't know why I'm asking. I'll be posting them whether you like it or not.
5 comments:
It would be interesting to see the list of winners and the categories too (if any).
There have been lots of comptetitions in other areas which don't rely on rigid style guidelines. An art competition, for example, might just break judging categories down into medium and subject, and other rules might just cover things like minimum age of the contestant, size of the entry, etc.
Big dog shows are more like beer competitions. It may be worth noting that dog show criteria are widely criticisized for having terrible effects on individual breeds.
It’s anyone’s guess on the Trappist beer really. The brewery might well have just called it the closest name that would be familiar to English speakers. Or might be using the word in its original meaning, analogous to the English “keeping beer”. Or maybe they really were brewing dark lager. The Lezak from Warsaw puzzles me. Warsaw was under Prussian rule at the time, and is Lezak even a Polish word?
Beer competitions like the International Brewing Awards use serving format as a category, I.E Sullivan’s Red ale won in 2017 in the keg ale competition.
Oscar
Warsaw was part of the Russian Empire at the time.
Oops. Yes, quite volatile in the 19th century.
Post a Comment